Firstly, there are multiple characters, and you can swap between them as you play. There are two things that Pascal’s Wager gets right. Yes, they completely misunderstood how storytelling in this genre goes, and so have provided a cutscenes-heavy story that removes any sense of mystery and interpretation as you’re playing. Voice performances are bad enough to make the ears bleed, and the developers seem to have decided that the “problem” with Dark Souls was that the story wasn’t explicit enough. Many sound effects are badly compressed, and whenever you can see into the distance there’s a combination of pop-in (for stuff that’s within the levels), and featureless nothingness (for the spaces outside of the level). However, everything else about Pascal’s Wager is exactly what you’d expect from a dodgy mobile port. The presentation of the character models are fine, and in fairness, there is a decent rage of enemies. Clamber down a ladder to open a door that was previously locked, and yes, you’ll have a shortcut back to the nearest “bonfire” (an egg statue rather than Dark Souls’s fires), and that would be good an all, except that the “long way” is only about a minute’s walk itself, and it hardly matters which path you actually take. Rinse and repeat.Įnvironments are broken up into levels, a little like they are in Nioh, but the levels are so small that exploring these levels doesn’t have the same reward as it does with Nioh, or any of its other peers. Wait for the enemy to pause, dash in, get a stab in, duck back out again. There’s noticeable input delay behind every strike and dodge and while you can, eventually, adjust your rhythms to account for that input delay, it still results in action that is stilted, has little impact, and tactically uninteresting.
Unfortunately, Pascal’s Wager is brutally clunky to play, and for a Souls game, I can’t think of anything more damning than the word “clunky”. If that was the only problem with Pascal’s Wager then it could still have been tolerable. Unfortunately, this is, again, a mobile game, where pretty much everything is there for the sake of giving players content, and consequently, it doesn’t actually say or do anything with the theme. The first boss is a flagellant, and the religious theme that runs through it could have helped to distinguish it from the many other Souls clones. There is a seed of a cool concept in Pascal’s Wager. Each of those “centrepiece” moments look like the developers played the Souls games through to completion and then decided to copy them, only without creative energy or talent to make them interesting. You play as some fallen paladin in some grimdark world (I lost interest about ten minutes after starting the game and so I don’t remember his name), and you then crawl around levels killing things on the way to a boss battle. This game was originally developed for mobile, and it shows it every step of the way. Pascal’s Wager, the game, is shallow, thoughtless, and certainly won’t be remembered centuries down the track. There are plenty of ways to pull this apart and critique it, and that’s what makes it a fascinating and enduring mental exercise, but the point that I’m making here is that Pascal’s wager, the philosophy, is so much more interesting Pascal’s Wager, the game, which is perhaps the worst Souls clone I’ve ever played. On the other hand, choosing not to believe in God means that that is the best outcome.
Based on that, the best position to take in the gamble is to believe in God, since the worst outcome is that nothing happens when you die. That consequence is that believing in God results in heaven, and not believing in God results in hell. If, however, God does exist, then there’s a consequence to dying. It breaks down like this: If God does not exist, then whether you believe in him or not is irrelevant because nothing happens when you die. Pascal’s wager, the philosophical concept, is an excellent thought exercise that considers that humans play a simple game, not unlike the Prisoner’s Dilemma, on whether we should believe God exists.
0 kommentar(er)
